Quote from: Cryptomagnus on December 18, 2017, 04:41:12 PM

Quote from: Omnia Vanitas on December 18, 2017, 10:31:59 AM

I had my account banned too:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1331779

I tried to contact theymos - who banned me - but he didn't answer.

In the meanwhile I understand perfectly the necessity to improve the post quality, I think that to ban people by personal judgement about what is good and what is not it's completely useless, moreover if you don't give any explanation or feedback.

The only response you will have is that banned people will disclose a lot of accounts, with a lot of useless posts, just to have more probability to have a functional account.

It seems to me that this is not a good results.

I think that a better policy would be to give a warn, and - if there is no effect - only then to give a permanent ban.

But I don't think this will happen: the god like power moderators have here probably makes them to consider the rest of us just like garbage to get rid off.
Probably this account will be banned too, just to show who is the master here.

Is this the results you want to achieve?

Totally agree: we need to improve post quality, but permanent ban is a solution worst than the problem.

For decent people a warn is more than enough cause decent people blame themselves for being banned. A permanent ban only affects those who want to be part of this community in the light of the sun. Only with these kind of persons mods can act as if they were gods because with the others - those who really make this place a shit - they receive a shrug and a laugh.