Quote from: TomPetty on December 20, 2017, 09:15:21 PM

Quote from: c_e_d on December 20, 2017, 08:54:46 PM

Quote from: JwJimJim on December 20, 2017, 01:10:02 PM

SegSig is a larger update then PoW2, I still want to see how MaNI pulls off 58% savings on SegSig when the bitcoin devs could only manage 25% on SegWit.

Sure I will grant him best dev in crypto status if he manages it.

BTC carries the burden of keeping old/long time outdated nodes on the network, limiting the savings alot for another couple versions (translates into years!).
They are on v0.15 and I still see v0.10 nodes on the network. Cry

During the activation phases (giving users time to update their wallets), Gulden 2.0 will leave old 1.6 nodes step by step behind and is than free of that burden.

Pretty sure this is part of the magic.
Still doesn't take anything away from the great dev work.

When Gulden gets a USD trading pair it will be a good time to drop out of the btc pairings. Unfortunately the crypto traders don't see the value in Gulden for some reason and the correct course of action would be to remove the btc pairings.

Bittrex $0.146111
Nock $0.159440

Would it be possible for Gulden community to ask the bitcoin exchanges to drop Gulden as I don't see 1 Euro value being reached on bittrex.

It balances out , no need to remove btc pairings. It looks to me traders are buying off bittrex to supply users buying off Nocks. I also believe litebit and Guldentrader get their stock off bittrex.

This is also the least amount of sales I have seen on bittrex since I started looking at this coin. less then 2 million. Distribution looking good.