Quote from: mineru on December 21, 2017, 09:56:57 PM

Quote from: zincra on December 21, 2017, 02:03:03 PM

My idea is to have core grupp with major holders, who can speaks on coin development. Not they control any but have thought to be considered and info what will be avaible them before others. And maybe have suggestion tree for votes where major overs can vote by using their coin, few other coins have had similar systems. Like BITB, POSW and few others

You mean governance mechanisms/features? Not easy to implement. Its hard work but worth the effort for sure. Something to put on the list maybe. Problem as always is who will implement that, how and when.

In technological way its rather Big step, but as a idea it not have to be hard. I BITB there is, like People had to prove they own atlest 1% of coin to become memeber of core team. And they donated 250K BITBs as they joined and 50K monthly to pool, where funds were used on development procress and Givaways. For core membership they can direct development, but not controll it as its stll for dev deap right

POSW coin have same non technologiacl way. Need to have 100K+ POSW to join whale group where members can get all development info and market info first, as Pump info also.

For starting IFLT could do similar non tech governance mechanics. And maybe later in 10 years if coin is survived and developed enough could find a way to make it tech. Just ideas!