Quote from: ajqjjj on December 21, 2017, 07:43:03 PM

Quote from: adroitful_one on December 21, 2017, 06:25:11 PM

Quote from: begnme on December 21, 2017, 01:46:19 PM

I have never been a naysayer of NiceHash. In fact, I have successfully rented out my miners for months with more profitable results than mining with ccminer to a local wallet. But now that they are "Back from the brink"...here is my experience:

I test the waters last night and after a few false starts I get a prediction from NH that I will make $2.75 in 24 hours per GPU (I have 4 older GPU's). Great this is even better than before the hack! I check my NH balance after 12 hours and I have barely over $1 and I am expecting $5 based on NH calculations. Anyone else seeing similar results? If that is how they are going to "recover" then count me out I am back to ccminer!

I'm sure most of this is probably due to more miners coming back online. You probably started out with lets say 100 miners mining on that algorithm. Then, after 10 hours or so, another 300 came online. Hence creating more competition and lowering the price you would make.

I have not started my mining pathway yet with the nice hash but still waiting for their server active again. I am also looking forward for big profit so right place would be nice hash I believe.
They cannot able to return the fund for the peopwl who was sell their hashes with them. Keep it aside. Tell me will it be a profitable for goes with that with trust again?

At this point in time, I'd rather solomine than aim my miners with Nicehash. Though their idea of mining the most profitable coin at the given moment is cool, still they already have left an unpleasant taste with the recent hack they've ran into. It is profitable, yes, sometimes outperforming some traditional miners' way, but then again, think of the scenario that they've been hack. Wouldn't that be negligence on their part?