Quote from: Next-Level on December 22, 2017, 05:00:40 AM

Quote from: coinmr on December 22, 2017, 01:03:07 AM

Quote from: Next-Level on December 21, 2017, 10:12:36 PM

Quote from: TokenStars on December 21, 2017, 09:51:43 PM

Quote from: zaphold on December 21, 2017, 08:02:48 PM

That's a bit of a pickle, isn't it? On the one hand, it's clear that Next-Level's unwillingness to pass KYC is nothing but an attempt to make more money, as ETH and BTC have by now about quadrupled in price. On the other hand, TokenStars representatives here did claim that they would refund anyone who doesn't want to pass KYC. I guess what they didn't anticipate, however, I take it mostly because of their utter commitment to the project and belief in its future success is how many people would want to get out of the project now if given the opportunity. Because let's face it, most of the participants went in in the hopes of future gains above all else.

TokenStars have been very honest right from the get-go, never ducking or dodging a comment and always responding in a timely fashion, and I would hate to see someone taking advantage of that. Next-Level and the likes should be left to live with their prior decision to commit, and if they don't want to pass KYC it's their own deal, no refunds should follow. After all, they did sign the agreement and it was all there in black and white.

TokenStars should feel no guilt either for not being willing to refund because of that one comment that they made. They could've just said no refunds period, and would've been right to do so. Instead they decided to be too kind for their own good and make sure that those who failed to give the agreement a proper read wouldn't get screwed. And now people try to screw them for that. No way!

Thank you for your support!

What the hack you talking about? This is a blatant accusation without any foundation! If you do a serious review you would see, that I reclaim for a refund long time before there is any "quadrupled prices". That is not about money, that is about principle and justice. Just for your records: My contribution was 28.9.2017 and I was faced with sudden KYC after a month!

If TokenStar really wants me to recapture the hole story, that all the investors who have been faced with the unwanted KYC in hindsight will lose their money? Or should I say, be robbed?

I was clearly promised that a refund would be made if I did not want to fulfill the KYC for security reasons. That's why I waited in peace. And now to read, "get used to it, dude, your money is ours now" between the lines again ...

If this happens, this story will not end here - that is MY promise.

Why did you put your "digital signature" (checked the box near the words I have read and agreed to the terms of the token sale) before even opening and reading it? Whose fault is this?

And now accusing of robbery between the lines?

Upload the documents and receive your ACE tokens.

Why you put in your hypocritical two pennies worth while don't have any clue what you are talking about?
Do you ever read any 30 page terms of whatever if you buy things? Nobody does, because it is an unrealistic imposition!

But it does not even matter, because what is described in 6.3.3 DID NOT HAPPEN anyway. If it had happened, I would not have make any investment. There is nothing about a KYC will be come AFTERWARDS. So it is NOT my fault. Inform yourself before comment or stay out.

Ok. If you don't read contracts before signing them it is your choice! Maybe you will change your mind next time.

By the way, you are missing a nice opportunity to sell ACE at the price higher than ICO )