Quote from: c-tek on July 08, 2013, 08:27:15 AM

Quote from: Bicknellski on July 08, 2013, 06:56:22 AM

Comments?

Quote

Quote from: JHenderson on Today at 08:40:04
Thought FCC guidelines were to resolve interference issue with other electronic components not mitigate against potential heath risks. FCC and FDA are different

Contrary to all my competitors I do take EMC seriously and designed these boards to be compliant. (which did increase price)
Emission testing is scheduled for next week, but the Lab hasn't yet confirmed my appointment.
The boards will be tested against EN55022.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=179769.msg2678377#msg2678377

There are no components on the board that their function will generate interference greater then the maximum admissible value of FCC.
This is just marketing IMHO.

Um.. What? Given a 2 layers board and a 32Mhz oscillator that is routed all over the place, I think the FCC would not be so sure..

Enigma