Quote from: Capazoolo on December 23, 2017, 05:11:36 PM

Quote from: gargavaar on December 23, 2017, 04:54:36 PM

Quote from: i-synthestech on December 22, 2017, 07:38:47 AM

Quote from: gargavaar on December 21, 2017, 06:36:03 PM

The biggest issue with this ICO is the very premise of creating gold. I know that gold can be created by artificial means but all published papers on the subjects use either nuclear reactors or beam accelerators, both of which create barely trace amounts of precious metals at massive energy expenditure.
Is there any peer reviewed articles on this new LENR process and why it will make it commercially viable?

Thank you for the question.
We recommend you to read the following articles:
https://synthestech.com/LuganoReport.pdf
https://synthestech.com/IwamuraYobservatiob.pdf
https://synthestech.com/CERN-Report.pdf
https://synthestech.com/CirilloDtransmutat.pdf
https://synthestech.com/NASA_Presentation.pdf
These are Nasa report on LENR, US navy laboratory LNR, CERN report, and the most reliable Lugano report, Iwamura report. There are thousands of other reports, only what was published around the the world. These all are reports on experiments.
On theoretical issues, we rely on Bazhutov's erzion model as the most elaborated. I recommend to read this arcticle about Erzion Model:
http://www.iccf19.com/.../download/poster/PS04_Bazhutov.pdf

Once again about lead, according to studies of other researchers, lead is end point for transmutation process of many radioactive isotopes during LENR. And there is no evidence, that they had any valuable elements as byproduct. Gold is very easily traceable with chemical qualitative reaction. We dont consider it perspective, but certainly will do additional reaserch. The most perspective we consider Hydrargyrum, though it is very difficult to work with it.
Results that we had was about Tungsten to Platinum group metals.

The last link is broken for me, is it region locked?
I'll look through the others but they are hosted on your own site which could be a credibility issue as I can't confirm if they are authentical publications of NASA or CERN. Do you have liks to the original source on each respective organisations web page?
Also I wondered the other day, what are the main precursors you aim to use? Many elements commonly used in these applications are produced in lower quantities than gold, isn't it a risk that the cost of the precursor will rapidly mirror that of gold?
Can you use common elements such as lead?

I think they can also use other metals which are not much rare and available easily to the laboratory and this will not make the price of the product formed equal to gold due to this. Yes me too have the same question can lead be used ?. And one more thing is the project tokens fully used or some of the tokes are reserved for the future?.

Once again about lead, according to studies of other researchers, lead is the end point for transmutation process of many radioactive isotopes during LENR. And there is no evidence, that they had any valuable elements as a byproduct. Gold is very easily traceable with chemical qualitative reaction. We dont consider it a perspective but certainly will do additional research. The most perspective we consider Hydrargyrum, though it is very difficult to work with it.
Results that we had was about Tungsten to Platinum group metals.