Quote from: cryptojayman on December 24, 2017, 01:17:57 AM

I like your coin dev and I like your code, would be nice if you added more comments in your code though Wink

but I understand it enough. I will run a full node when main net goes live. Though I agree with most of the other people on here. CHEAT should be renamed. It has a very negative connotation in English speaking countries.

F - those english speakin.. they are minority against all xD
Personally my opinion is that this is the best name for crypto coin. because in general all currency, and crypto currency as well or even more is sort of cheat mode in order to exchange some material goods and/or services (because by itself it has no real value at all).

Quote from: newegggo on December 24, 2017, 03:16:31 AM

Quote from: TeamTT on December 23, 2017, 10:53:37 PM

Quote from: cheatoshin0 on December 23, 2017, 04:24:56 PM

Quote from: jukKas on December 23, 2017, 04:08:09 PM

Why is this coin called CheatCoin? Care devs explain further why is this project created?

Please read our white paper http://cheatcoin.atwebpages.com/Cheatcoin.doc. The goal is to create a distributed payment system with a large capacity, which is based on the DAG instead of blockchain. The name is already recognized as bad. However it attracts attention well.)

The project is very interesting and it looks like you (dev) is really serious about it. I suggest to make a rebranding before launch, cheating sounds really bad to me...

I agree with you. Cheat might attract people's attention, but doesn't sound like a serious project.

I suggest no rebranding or renaming. It is humans right for intellectual freedom to attach any kind of meaning for words. i.e. geek today it has more positive meaning than about hundred years ago..
there is no bad words, but now cheatcoin miner and wallet is little bit behind from starting.
From comments above it can not be launched due flaws in security (maybe it was improved a bit) and sync algorithms. Good money trading system should trustworthy , but since is lacking in QA. it is a bit rush to start in less than 3 weeks of simple level testing. My personal opinion first 'real' coins probably can be asked to be eliminated before it evaluates to real cash-money market, or after that we can wait for huge hacking attack after this coin gets significant dollar value (everything has extreme security level until it represent no value). For darknet transactions - it is whatever if someone is buyin' and someone is sellin' then nobody cares about security nonsence until somebody gets spotted stealing coins in large amounts.

I would prefer quality product. Now it looks fragile to be real one. It needs to gain few layers of armour.

Sorry for criticism, but I don't have good solutions, cause this is not my area of expertise and I do not see exact weak spots (but there was some major and I believe there is few left).