You're right, ASICMINER doesn't have a picture of a
Chenbro 4U Open-bay Compact Rackmount Chassis on a website. Primarily because:
1. ASICMINER doesn't have a website
2. ASICMINER doesn't sell Chenbro 4U Open-bay Compact Rackmount Chassis
I mean, let's be honest here. ASICMINER doesn't have a 24.576 TH miner, and neither do you. ASICMINER does, however, have a lot of 10 GH miners, which you don't.
Do we really need to go the bashing route? More than one business following the Asicminer model is a good thing, not a bad one. That is just a pic of the main chassis that the upcoming miners will use.
Alright, I admit my comment was slightly provocative, but I don't think I stated anything that isn't a fact. I wasn't trying to bash anyone; just point out that comparing a shipping product to a product in development will
always make you look superior.
It reminds me of rivaling chip producers like AMD and Intel. When Intel is leading in chip performance, AMD, or supporters hereof, will say "Yeah, but just wait until the new 20 nm AMD chip comes out, it'll be
much faster than that Intel chip.". Of course that's true, but Intel won't be sitting still while AMD is working on a new chip.
You're right, ASICMINER doesn't have a picture of a
Chenbro 4U Open-bay Compact Rackmount Chassis on a website. Primarily because:
1. ASICMINER doesn't have a website
2. ASICMINER doesn't sell Chenbro 4U Open-bay Compact Rackmount Chassis
I mean, let's be honest here. ASICMINER doesn't have a 24.576 TH miner, and neither do you. ASICMINER does, however, have a lot of 10 GH miners, which you don't.
Yes, let's be honest we are going to build these and when we do, how may of those 10 GH/s miners will it take to make 1 of these, the answer is 2,457 and these will use a lot less power to boot.
As I mentioned above, ASICMINER is also developing news chips. Hell,
everyone is!
So yes, your future technology beats ASICMINER's present technology. Future technology
always beats present technology.