Quote from: nowaltcoin on December 25, 2017, 11:59:15 AM

Quote from: 7anonminer7 on December 25, 2017, 04:47:17 AM

Quote from: tf2addict on December 24, 2017, 07:05:41 PM

I am seeing a nearly 10% jump in hash rate on my RX 570 rigs for version 11 compared to version 10. Not sure about power usage but I don't think it changed much if at all (and who cares for that kind of jump in hash rate). Now to see if that actually translates to hash rate gain at the pool.

Anyone else seeing this kind of improvement with version 11?

I've been using claymore v11 for around one day, and yes it seems there's hashrate increase - judging from the miner info.
However, I've been keeping an eye on actual statistics of the pool I'm mining on - and it looks like hashrate is actually quite lower.

To give an example - 2 of my GPUs (RX 570 btw) are mining with claymore v9.7 with 1650 H/s total on average (stat from the miner) - pool statistics are similar.
Another 2 GPUs are mining with claymore v11 with 1830 H/s (same pool, BIOS, OC settings).
However, if I bluntly compare average shares per hour ratio (I know the difficulties can differ though), I get around 375 for BOTH sets of GPUs on v9.7 and v11.

I'm starting to get suspicious (and a bit paranoid) about v11.

Same for me!

I'am using:

6 * hd 7790 with version 9.7 and hashrate at miner site is the same on pool site!
6 * rx 460 with version 10.2 and hashrate at miner site is the same on pool site!
4 * hd 7850 with version 9.7 and hashrate at miner site is the same on pool site! (can not use 10.2 too much miscalculated)
2 * hd 7850 + 2 * R9 270 with version 9.7 and hashrate at miner site is the same on pool site! (can not use 10.2 too much miscalculated)

i changed the rx 460 the hd 7850 and the r9 270 to version 11.0 and now
for all these three rigs the hashrate is 5 % better at miners site but round about 10% lower at pool site ( i tested two pools)

so i switched back !

Yeah here too nanopool reports 8500hs and claymore 9400hs