Quote from: leea-1334 on December 25, 2017, 12:16:46 PM

Quote from: Patatas on December 22, 2017, 09:55:34 PM

Quote from: sculptoris on December 18, 2017, 06:24:28 PM

Is there any rating of bounty managers available? That could be a great resource to see who is most experienced and best.

- Aren't the forum's trust ratings enough ? I mean if someone's a good manager,that would reflect on his ratings.
- Moreover,who'd you call a great bounty manager ? Someone's who's good at managing spreedsheets or someone who can make sure the bounties help in reaching the target audience ?
-Subjective

Yes, it is subjective, but there can also be objective means to indicate if a bounty manager is good and effective. For me, for example, the bounty manager has very little control in helping bounties reach target audience. This is down to the project itself to set rules, to determine context and audience. The manager merely takes instructions and within his influence can ensure best meeting of standards.

Some clear objective indicators for me are 1> Manager is always timely with updates to and from project. 2 > Manager ensures high quality of participation, only accepts good posters, for example, and acknowledges all black lists and bans. 3 > Manager communicates well with constructive feedback. Can a poster improve? Can a poster be warned?

When it comes to ratings then it would really be different and I don't see trust ratings would really be majorly be a basis since not all ratings came from on managing campaigns. Choices would really differ since not all participants do have the same selections that we can able to make ranking precisely.I have seen and joined already some good bounty managers which are good on handling the project marketing at the same time on handling its participants.