Quote from: Blockchain E-mail Token on December 26, 2017, 02:00:25 PM

Quote from: Stephlambert on December 26, 2017, 05:03:52 AM

Quote

After 180 days your e-mails on servers of the American post providers become the property of the USA.

According to Wikipedia "Email that is stored on a third party's server for more than 180 days is considered by the law to be abandoned. All that is required to obtain the content of the emails by a law enforcement agency is a written statement certifying that the information is relevant to an investigation, without judicial review"

Can the team provide sources for what they claim? Because I cannot find anything related to this affirmation, and it's the only one that I have double checked so far because it seemed unlikely to me.

On a more personal note, I am actually quite happy that whistleblowers can access emails, and presenting Edward Snowden as a cybercriminal is quite laughable if you ask me.

I also find it interesting that each member of the team has 4 Linkedin connections, when the team is made out of 5 people. Looks like someone created fake profiles and added each member of the team.

But again, I can be wrong.

Hello Stephlambert,

You quite right found the law on 180 days, but you did not study it and only took the quote from Wikipedia.

We studied a question very carefully and here a small part of articles by which were guided when wrote WHITE PAPER:

1)   http://donferguson.sys-con.com/node/44580

2)   http://www.businessinsider.fr/us/when-can-the-government-read-your-email-2013-6/

3)   http://www.zdnet.com/article/yes-the-fbi-and-cia-can-read-your-email-heres-how/

Please study these articles and the law in more detail and you will understand why we so interpreted this law!!!

Concerning team the answer in the following post

Best regards,
Team of the Blockchain E-mail Token

Hi,

Thank you for the answer.
I have read your articles, and none of them mention that "After 180 days your e-mails on servers of the American post providers become the property of the USA".
On top of that, your sources are articles that are years old (more than 10 years old for some!), and there is no echo of this "issue" in recent articles, so I believe that is because these articles were misinformed and/or were trying to grab some attention with some sensationalism.

I am also still waiting to understand why the team seems to all have 4 connections on LinkedIn, apart from He Tengfei Kim, but he's also the only one who does not show his face.

You can agree that this lack of transparency does not inspire confidence in your project, and transparency is what is needed in ICO recently.