Quote from: Lemon on July 10, 2013, 08:46:37 PM

Quote from: Rawted on July 05, 2013, 05:08:29 PM

Then suck it up, have someone drive you to your house, and spend the 2 minutes it takes to send out people's btc?

Would you mind giving your private key and bank account login details to a number of people? Suck it up.

*sigh* Straw man. Nobody is suggesting you give out login credentials; if they were, why bother driving you anywhere?

Quote from: TheButterZone on July 10, 2013, 09:01:31 PM

... play the victim, despite suffering no physical harm and pretending to have skin as thin as a single layer of carbon nanotubes ... It's utterly predictable. ...

Quote from: Lemon on July 10, 2013, 08:46:37 PM

... speaking with the police over the actions of some of the users of this forum (I can only assume that you are one of them) ...
... iwilcox and btcfaucet can act as menacing as they like ...

Quote from: Lemon on July 10, 2013, 09:01:03 PM

... those fuckwits who kept continually trying to harass me during my recovery ...

"menacing" must refer to: collecting your fantasy claims and quoting them back, pointing out your slimy evasive habits and asking you difficult questions. I don't think the word means what you think it does, which makes me question (for the first time, which is a bit embarrassing for me) whether you ever got harassed, at all, by anyone, unless by "harassed" you mean "they continually asked me for their money back, like so many others have". Sounds like an imagined crime (and an equally imaginary of pursuit of justice) which you've created to make readers conclude that anyone with a bad word to say about you might be a perpetrator. Naturally, there's no way to falsify/verify a word of it. *yawn*.

Quote from: Lemon on July 10, 2013, 08:46:37 PM

... Having gone through my complete history, I see no record ...
... If people wish to contact me in relation to anything, they can do it via email - I will not be responding to this thread again ...

Uh-huh. Incredible bad luck with electronic communications: check. Driving enquiries off public forums so that it's your creditors' word against yours: check. San1ty openly requests and later openly asks for confirmation of receipt of his refund request, but of course, you've stopped reading this thread so can't confirm anything in a verifiable way.

Quote from: Lemon on July 10, 2013, 08:46:37 PM

A single (valid from start) refund request has come in, which I have seen today as I check through my backlog.

Sure, because your director and two silent partners couldn't have handled that in the past month; it had to be you. To quote myself, is that perhaps because crypto.pm was
only ever just you, sitting alone in your flat in your underwear?

Quote from: Lemon on July 10, 2013, 08:46:37 PM

I've counted 5 people claiming they're owed things who I've never done business with, which is pitiful. Let's make it a good dozen at least.

Really? 'cause I've counted jim667, BigBitz asking for their loans back, both of which you confirmed you owed; San1ty, FaradayC, Rawted asking for their crypto.pm investments back, at least San1ty's confirmed by you, and Azelphur asking for promised paperwork. Let's be charitable and ignore the nuPlay thing you seem to have promised to a bunch of people, so I'm not claiming you owe me or them anything. By my maths that's two people (FaradayC, Rawted) making claims the public can't verify. You seem to have let your guard down momentarily and made a claim about communications in a medium that's verifiable/falsifiable. Sloppy.

But fear not: while those claimants could probably sign challenges using the Bitcoin addresses they sent from (I believe someone has a record of your "investment" addresses) verifiably proving beyond reasonable doubt that they did business with you, you're always free to belatedly create GPG-signed agreements; you could easily conjure up e-mails whether you sent them or not, and they can't prove a negative (non-receipt). Phew! E-mail to the rescue.