Quote from: michaelmclees on June 23, 2011, 06:40:31 PM

Quote from: AyeYo on June 23, 2011, 04:27:40 PM

Quote from: michaelmclees on June 23, 2011, 03:47:58 PM

Quote from: AntiVigilante on June 23, 2011, 12:21:30 PM

Quote from: bittersweet on June 16, 2011, 05:25:00 AM

The violation is that someone took their land or other property by force, not that someone built a factory and offers them a job.

Survival pay is extortion. Beggars can't be choosers. A man with an empty stomach is not a bargaining man. Arguments about choice regarding a starving man are dishonest arguments.

If you truly want to hold that view in your head, then you must also be saying that the hungrier a person is, the more immoral it is to offer him a job. So the hungry man is unable to get a job, lest his employer be called an exploiter by you, and therefore he becomes either a parasite or dead.

You're no saint.

Sorry, not even close. Not in the same ballpark, not even in the same universe.

Explain.

Offering someone a job != offering someone a wage slavery position in which they are only kept alive enough to work. Your entire post is one big strawman.