Quote from: tertius993 on December 28, 2017, 10:45:26 AM

Quote from: crypt0kid on December 27, 2017, 08:37:58 AM

Quote from: FEARofDreams on December 26, 2017, 09:02:06 PM

Alright spoke with my dev team and we're going to commit resources to this project over the next few months. I'm starting a Dicord for anyone to get in on the conversations. Will link when it's up. It's time to fire thing bb up! Shocked

Well done, dude! Let's get this thing rolling and send Version into the stratosphere Grin

Great stuff.

It would be superb to see a refresh of the website and perhaps the wallet. I'd like to see the community engaged here in what they would like to see happen - what the coin really needs is exposure, so getting discussion going is an essential first step. I'm not really a user of the messaging apps but will check them out, however, bitcointalk is really the first stopping point for anyone new to crypto and coins so I'd strongly suggest we maintain this thread as it will have a much higher profile.

Pleased also to see noise23 contributing, he's done a huge amount to keep this coin going.

Some quick thoughts on how to position Version:

1. micro payments - its a low cost coin and always will be I think (though probably somewhat higher than the value today), so it is perfectly positioned for making low value/micro payments.

2. value - if you assume a fair value of BTC is somewhere between $10,000 and $20,000 (just for the example) then an ideal value for Version would be around 500-1000 sats - making one VersionCoin worth 5 to 20 cents. This would mean you could make a payment (using VersionCoin) of 1/100 of a cent for a fee (at the current fee rate) of around a half to one ten thousandth of a cent or less (could the network fees reduce if the increased that much?)

3. staking - it clearly stakes really well, and allows a very low risk way of generating a small income that could be used to support making such micro payments ( I haven't done any calculations to work out what the return would be, e.g. per 1,000/10,000 coins but might have a go at that)

4. name - "Version" is a really difficult name to search for as it generates so many misleading hits, I'd suggest the name be standardised as "VersionCoin" which is already used in some places

I know that Version may not be showing up well in search results, but in my opinion, it's only because we haven't done SEO for Version. There is a lot in a name, for example a coin just named Zero or Verge, just to name a few. Personally I prefer a shorter name, so I don't have any issues with Version. Maybe we can put this up to a vote, but shorter is better in my book. I just think that the SEO needs to be done and the name will show up more. In general 1 word coins tend to go to the moon and are very easy to remember, but I could be wrong. Just my 2 cents.