Quote from: D3m0nKinGx on December 28, 2017, 05:29:19 PM

Quote from: fedmahnkassad on December 28, 2017, 05:09:47 PM

Quote from: D3m0nKinGx on December 28, 2017, 04:32:46 PM

Nothing's stopping ppl from buying/selling Eth being 700$+ a coin and trading with volumes over 10,000 BTC / 24 hours on the 3 top exchanges. Byteball can do the same just as it is.

700$ you say? What would be the price of a GBYTE if it has the same market cap as ETH?

I'm talking about trading volume, not mkc. You're not on the same page. Other than that, I'm sure you already calculated what the price/gbyte would be at ETH's marketcap, which would be around 70,000$/gbyte when circulating supply reaches 1M. Bitcoin is nearing 20,000$, Who says Byteball can't do it, it's packed with more features, and a faster network than bitcoin.... so why not Cool

I have quite a lot of arguments for you... But I value my energy, it's my most precious asset. I'll say just this.. BRAND recognition. You cannot compare Byteball, as a brand, with Bitcoin. If Bitcoin would have sold in "bits" (1bit = 100 satoshi) instead of whole bitcoins, we'd probably be seeing a higher marketcap.

I've spoken with tens of people who are new to crypto-space, and most of them (i'd say 8 out of 10) initially tell me "this is cheap, this is expensive" based ONLY on price per unit.

There's actually a marketing science applied to price-tagging. Why do you think most of the prices you see in stores look like "$99.99" or "39.99"? Because most people think in the lines of "oh, this costs 90bucks, and this costs 30 bucks", when in reality it costs $100 and $40, respectively. Now this may not fool you or me and a few of the rest. But it damn works, and it boosts profits by 20 - 50%, based on industry.

I'm curious if there are actual concrete steps we could take on this direction. I'd be willing to put some effort into this.