Quote from: Dabs on December 28, 2017, 10:53:24 PM

Quote from: keesdewit on December 28, 2017, 07:31:14 PM

Quote from: whitehatrigs on December 28, 2017, 05:04:50 PM

Quote from: KiparisD on December 28, 2017, 01:45:10 PM

Quote from: starl1ng on December 28, 2017, 01:27:43 PM

I just pulled some code from the github repo, and i wanted to ask, should i compile a new wallet? I'm using v2.2.0.0 for both local wallet and masternode. So i'm wondering, did i miss an important update? Or it's just some minor fixes?

PM Dev, he will answer you with maximum accuracy, is this changes important enough

The thing that bothers me the most is the anonymous team. This will be the real hindrance to the project going forward.

He can just sell his tokens at any given point in time once the price hits it's hidden agenda level, abandon the project and disappear leaving us with useless bags.

All serious project have serious and visible known teams behind them. Developer who conceal it's identity for no reason whatsoever is a huge RED FLAG.

Also, the Github repository is not very active at all, very shady:
https://github.com/Solaris-Project/Solaris/

This is maybe just about building community, some marketing roadmap and no development at all.

One big announcement, price spike and he can disappear. I'm not saying he will, but that's certainly the risk with people hiding for some reason.

The thing that bothers you most does not exist. Luckely for you I am not anonymous. As you can see in github I did the technical development of the coin. Me -> Kees de Wit, Zaanstad, the Netherlands. Skype: keesdewit82

What more you want? My creditcard? Grin

Also, that's what I'm here for. I'm holding the premine, so funds do not move before any announcement is made. At the very least, people have a few days notice. Funds for bounties and marketing campaigns such as signatures and social media and ongoing development are released as soon as announced and when available.

It is in the best interest of the dev to maintain his coin, the price appreciates, and by next year there will be new features as indicated in the roadmap. There will be zerocoin protocol and proof of stake. If the dev has any masternodes, just like all others, they get continuous cashflow.

When the time comes, the budget system will be activated, and that's probably even bigger than what any single masternode owner will get. These will go towards ongoing development and bounties and other campaigns.

The grand daddy masternode coin of all, which is Dash, can now afford a superbowl advertisement. They didn't do one yet.

Speaking of which, is there a simple formula or spreadsheet on how to calculate or estimate average masternode earnings as more masternodes come online? Right now there are 300+. I want to know how much we get if there are 400, 500, 600, 800 or 900 masternodes total. (For comparison, the biggest masternode coin has more than 4000 masternodes.) At what point is it too many, although there will ever be only about 100 new masternodes per year after next year.

Quote from: GlobalProtection on December 28, 2017, 10:48:07 PM

Can someone tell me what to say to someone who objects to Solaris because the supply says "unlimited" on the Solaris website?

The person who brought this up to me does have a point because a cryptocoin's value is determined by several things and one of them is scarcity.

If the supply of this coin is going to be inflated in the future, how can you say this is not going to factor into the value of the coin?

Please revolve your answer around the infinite supply issue of this coin. Thanks, G.P.

The rate of inflation is small, something like 130k coins per year. It will continue to slow down, just see the supply schedule in the OP.

Ethereum also unlimited 4 millions coin generated per year Wink

Solaris save investment and soon we see 100 $ per coin