Quote from: palgin on December 29, 2017, 04:39:26 PM

So, take me to court and prove it, man, take your destiny in your hands, become millionaire/billionaire/trillionaire (underline wanted).

First question, why do you need my source if it's not better than ccminer? What are you doing here? Oh, maybe you're GPL-police officer who decides who "no doubt" violates GPL, and who "doubtfully" violates GPL?

Second question, this one ritorical, what you consider GPL violation? For example, ccminer uses NVML wrapping, my miner uses NVML wrapping, all based on one library provided by Nvidia, code will be nearly exactly the same because it's lib provided by 3rd-party, is it GPL violation or not? If 1+1=2 why should I do 3-1=2? Or maybe you have inside info from planet Nibiru?

You obviously haven't read the GPL license in your own ccminer fork that you used to create "hsrminer":

  "When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you
have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for
them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you
want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new
free programs, and that you know you can do these things.

  To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you
these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have
certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if
you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.

  For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether
gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same
freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive
or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they
know their rights."

Soooo many references to freedom that you probably don't understand it, living so close to the Kremlin in Moscow and all. I'm so sure you independently wrote your own neoscrypt algo cuda code, along with the rest of the mining program that isn't common "library" code.

Whatevs. It's not about being the "GPL police". It does mean not claiming code you didn't write, trying to make a profit from it. It's not about rhetoric, either; it's a matter of respecting community property, not persuading everyone that you have a right to take and use what isn't yours to begin with.

As far as the rest of your slights, I'll choose to ignore them since it's apparent to everyone that you have a different view of what comprises theft these days. And yes, I got that info directly from Nibiru.

Good luck with the Cryptonite fork, btw. I'm sure you'll create another outstanding closed-source coin from it.

Cheers, and Happy New Year, comrade. I really don't give a shit what you do with it, I ain't using it.