Quote from: SHIELD_Joe on January 02, 2018, 02:30:50 PM

Quote from: pedjo99 on January 02, 2018, 11:26:04 AM

Question to Shield_Joe, how do you guys from Shield dev team plan to deal with top 10, or at least top 5 addresses, which have siginificant percentage of accumulated XSH in their wallets? Question is regarded to future masternodes and eventually new big investors, which would recognize is as a threat for our ECO..

We're still thinking about it. The situation is this, everyone should be able to have SHIELD. If we penalize everyone now who has more than 10 million SHIELD maybe than we'll have to start with people with more than 5 million which would be bad for the coin meaning we can't actually do anything about people having a lot of SHIELD. If we would give them a penalty they would just put it in multiple wallets, or more likely sell which wouldn't be considered a good approach. We're working on getting some more places to spend SHIELD, which may shake some SHIELD of the big whales. There isn't much we can do. But in the long run I expect it to even out, we'll thinking of ways to make it happen faster without penalizing anyone for believing in SHIELD Wink

. Thanks for the concern it's questions like these we like to get!

I understand your concerns about this. Maybe solution is very simple, without penalizing anyone. There should be fixed amount of XSH needed for MN, lets say 500k for example. No matter how much more user have, he would have same weight for running his MN. Yes, that would force him to create more wallets/future masternodes, but that would also bring us more stable network with even more masternodes. So by that you have win/win situation- stable network/ wallets with lower overall balance, which looks healthier for our eco... thats just my opinion, hope you have understood my thoughts