Quote from: Vbs on July 17, 2013, 06:06:29 PM

Quote from: btcmonkey on July 17, 2013, 05:15:26 PM

Did you miss that my whole argument is that 0.15 per 100MH/s when network 1500TH/s is still a good price (~58% annual return)? Totally competitive with anyone in the market (by orders of magnitude). If you did the math assuming ~250TH/s network (poor decision IMO), then the estimated rate of return is like 350% (meaning you earn 3.5BTC per 1 BTC invested). So yes an 83% 'devaluation' from ridiculous to pretty-good-and-totally-competitive.

It's not an annual return when the share value is going down faster than what you receive in dividends during that time-frame. Annual return supposes you can (1) sell it at the same price as you bought it one year later, while (2) earning dividends during a year. Unfortunately, condition #1 doesn't hold.

In Finland we have about 5.5 million people.

For Finland 0.5% pa for normal bank account is normal.

We pay for credit in bank about 3.5%-> any way to put money to earn money more than 3.5% is profit EVEN if you take credit from bank.

AND YOU ARE TELLING THAT PRICE FOR SHARE WILL GO DOWN?
If share will pay dividends less than 10% pa, then it price will go down....

If it will - seller side is a idiot.

(imho)

The only thing that you must to believe that bitcoin will not drop less that 99$/btc