Quote from: ny2cafuse on January 05, 2018, 01:06:54 PM

Quote from: kitkat008 on January 04, 2018, 10:20:45 PM

Well first things first what is the end game here.

My idea would be:

- Name change to show big changes
- Algo change is possible but need a good reason...

I have no endgame for this. To be honest, that's the main reason I wanted to rebrand. Unless we strike a deal with Amagi or similar for them to use KDC, I don't see a tie to gold that we can make. The only way I could see us do that without a 3rd party is to somehow link to goods or services we run ourselves.

So with regard to a name change, I would be open for it, but others have stated they wouldn't want to rebrand in the past.

But all of this is easy enough to change over time, so we can make adjustments as needed as we figure things out. The biggest concern I have right now is developing the blockchain stack for this, and making sure the blockchain stays healthy.

-Fuse

I don't think the original intention was to tie it to gold so much (the gold thing on the OP looks gimmicky). I feel the name should be kept, it's a good name. We're in the midst of a crypto "GoldRush".

In terms of tasks, do you think you could get BCT to allow you to moderate this thread to update the first post?

I'll get round to setting up a node & block explorer shortly. The wallet should be recompiled and then work should begin on re doing the algo. (i'm not a programmer so can't help there sadly).