I have a question to Appcoins team,

AppCoins manipulated the bounty campaign section allocations after the ICO.  

I asked this question twice in the bounty thread and I didn't get any answer from the bounty manager and he went silent.

Previous allocations were

Campaign 1: Signature campaign : 42% allocation
Campaign 2: Articles campaign : 37% allocation
Campaign 3: Twitter campaign : 5% allocation
Campaign 4: Translations campaign : 10% allocation
Campaign 5: Telegram campaign : 2 % allocation
Campaign 6: Reddit campaign : 4 % allocation


You have changed it to,

Campaign 1: Signature campaign : 40% allocation
Campaign 2: Articles campaign :42.5% allocation
Campaign 3: Twitter campaign : 6% allocation
Campaign 4: Translations campaign : 8% allocation
Campaign 5: Telegram campaign : 2% allocation
Campaign 6: Reddit campaign : 1.5% allocation

It 's really UNPROFESSIONAL and UNETHICAL to do so. You increased the allocation for articles campaign by doing that which has a totally private spreadsheet.

It seems you cheated bounty hunters without noticing this section allocation change.  

Now they got less number of tokens than they expected to get except articles and twitter campaign participants.

How stakeholders really trust this project if you already did such a horrible thing to bounty hunters who helped to reach the ICO hard cap?

I need an answer.