Quote from: jovi99 on January 05, 2018, 05:23:15 PM

I have a question to Appcoins team,

AppCoins manipulated the bounty campaign section allocations after the ICO. Angry

I asked this question twice in the bounty thread and I didn't get any answer from the bounty manager and he went silent.

Previous allocations were

Campaign 1: Signature campaign : 42% allocation
Campaign 2: Articles campaign : 37% allocation
Campaign 3: Twitter campaign : 5% allocation
Campaign 4: Translations campaign : 10% allocation
Campaign 5: Telegram campaign : 2 % allocation
Campaign 6: Reddit campaign : 4 % allocation

You have changed it to,

Campaign 1: Signature campaign : 40% allocation
Campaign 2: Articles campaign :42.5% allocation
Campaign 3: Twitter campaign : 6% allocation
Campaign 4: Translations campaign : 8% allocation
Campaign 5: Telegram campaign : 2% allocation
Campaign 6: Reddit campaign : 1.5% allocation

It 's really UNPROFESSIONAL and UNETHICAL to do so. You increased the allocation for articles campaign by doing that which has a totally private spreadsheet.

It seems you cheated bounty hunters without noticing this section allocation change. Angry

Now they got less number of tokens than they expected to get except articles and twitter campaign participants.

How stakeholders really trust this project if you already did such a horrible thing to bounty hunters who helped to reach the ICO hard cap?

I need an answer.

Some users have been complaining about this. However, the final allocation was the one that was initially announced. There was a miscommunication related with the translation bounties, which led Sylon to change the distribution mid ICO. But the final values were always meant to be these.