Quote from: hkalvin on January 06, 2018, 03:41:41 PM

Quote from: bible_pay on January 06, 2018, 02:20:35 PM

Quote from: hkalvin on January 06, 2018, 11:30:11 AM

Quote from: oliwer21 on January 06, 2018, 08:37:08 AM

Quote from: pkman999 on January 06, 2018, 05:36:08 AM

Dear Rob
Can you tell me?
Why? Our mining project to get low coins?
Maybe i am error for test , the info below

1 PC = 24 core = share 48
1 PC = 24 core (tested 1 of 1vCPU = total 24 vPC ) = share 91
1 PC = 24 core (tested 1 of 4vCPU = total 6 vPC) = share 62
Same PC ~Same Ram ~Same network

Big Share= get more coin or not?

I called top of 3 big dog to tested . This is correct detail data.
Please fix the problem.

If you feel this is good at BBP future that you keep doing that.
Big pool fee is ok , I support.
But low coin of day that is not good.
Huh

I hope BBP will being just，fair and open.
I don't want any misunderstanding . Please explain. Love BBP Love this coin.

Thanks Rob ,Have are nice day

From Hong Kong ...Man

This problem is since... relese. Earlier in old topic Rob said he wont change it because he want to support small minners with low core cpus.
But I think, You already know from this topic that multiwallet is your 24 core cpu best friend Roll Eyes

especially since Rob takeoff limitation of solutions per ip from pool?

I had finished the test about the gain of BBP.

Testing equipment : Machine A & B are Dual L5630 CPU (2.4Ghz 8Core16Thread), all setting are same except cpu core setting
Machine C : AMD Ryzen Pro 1700X (3.4Ghz 8Core16Thread)
-----------------

machine A:
each VM with 2 core (around 410HSP) , Total 8 VM in 9hours BBP Gain = 196.2544
BBP per hour = 21.80604444

machine B :
each VM with 1 core(around 200HSP) , Total 16VM in 9hours BBP Gain = 486.0898
BBP per hour = 54.00997778

Machine C :
All CPU resource used by one BBP process(8500HSP), Each Day = 309.3764
BBP per hour = 12.89068333

This is undoubtedly a disadvantage for high-performance machines in current BBP calculate method.

High cost of high-performance machines but the return rate is lower than the low performance machine.

For example, John pay $ 1000 a day for machine rent to get 5000 BBP
Peter pay $200 a day and gets the same 5000 BBP
I do not think anyone wants to be John....

The huge question for machine A, the fast ryzen, is it running competetive mining?
The elephant in the room here is since we have the anti-GPU feature, the low-nonce limiter, the first thing a fast machine will be doing is hashing faster per second, using up all its nonces.

Please check to see if the fast testbed is running competetivemining=true?

ALL in competetive mining ( "competetive_mining": true,)

I did not turn it off by config and this is default auto true by version 1.0.7.5 (or later) by your mentioned.

I also want to know why such a huge difference. The result was based on the test time and configuration were same and sent by email to you before. Cry

This is the result of my second test, and forced to add this command competetivemining = true in conf file, but the result is worse than low-performance machines. Confirmed Not affected by the GPU because I already disable GPU function before test again.

So I had to stop and re-plan how to do to be the best solution.
The first step may not use high-performance machines again as considering the machine using high cost, but the return is lower than the cheap machine

Machine C :
All CPU resource used by one BBP process(8500HSP), 10 Hour = 241.6102
BBP per hour = 24.16102

Machine A Dual L5630 Around 3200HSP share amount ~150 ,Machine C AMD Ryzen 1700X Around 8500HSP share amount ~25