Quote from: Pro_x on January 07, 2018, 06:58:43 PM

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on January 07, 2018, 05:41:27 PM

Quote from: liljsbach on January 07, 2018, 05:08:44 PM

Damn, I'm surprised how hostile are ZCL holders against HUSH. A lot of FUD spread on social medias. However, the price doesn't seem to care.

Exactly, I'm surprised too. No one knew this much hate was filled in them against hush LOL. Let's reply them head-on! Wink

You know, fear.. They should be thankful. Who made them a replay protection for peanuts haha Grin

I own both zcl and hush. But, lead dev for zcl and btcp is going without any serious plan, again. zcl is pumped over the roof and they have what? No wallet, no date, looking by interviews from yesterday he dont have any idea how to fund development for btcp (again, after zlc, well we can use zen model, why thinking if we can borrow all), even a replay protection was made by hush dev for them, for so cheap that I understand it like it was a couple hour job on siesta. Also, hush will stay solid after btch, we all know what will happen with zlc after fork->grave.

Then you have this btcz which will be the next one in the roof https://btcz.rocks/en/, a very interesting project because of high tech and important difference in supply. Every other fork have cca 20m coins, this is stupid.

If zcl team dont get their head on track before fork, smart ones will dump them on peak before fork. Cant say this for hush, they have this btch for tech experiment, not to pump the dead coin. For me there is no dillema, btcp < btch. And btcz as silver to btch, stronger together with difference in supply

and barterdex and so on..