Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on July 21, 2013, 11:17:03 AM

Quote from: medicine on July 21, 2013, 10:49:59 AM

Quote from: Garr255 on July 21, 2013, 09:25:24 AM

Great!

Also, for our next round of COG.F I am thinking we stick with the same contract, and just change the inital price per contract for 20 shares from 2.5 to 10 btc each. This effectively prices the contracts at BTC0.5 per share.

Our last round of COG.F sold at BTC2.5 per contract for 20 shares and is now trading at BTC12 each! I hope to see the same kind of turnaround for our COG.F holders this time around

The security will be called COG.F2 and is already pending admin approval then will be up for voting on BTC-TC, but will not become active until the motion passes, of course!

Quote from: snowdropfore on July 21, 2013, 03:00:59 AM

why not 1:10 split??

I do believe a split will help liquidity on the market. I believe a 1:2 split would be more beneficial for Cognitive, on the basis that we would still have the integrity of being around BTC0.5 per share. If there are no objections I'll raise a motion for a 1:2 split

If you're seriously considering a stock split and favour a btc 0.5/share price for current shares and possibly the cog.f2 shares, a 1:2 split may not be enough. The shares are around 0.8-0.9 at the moment and if they split 1:2 the price will be around 0.4-0.45, then say things go quite well and the price jumps like it did with basic-mining, we're right back to this price point in no time at all.

i personally think if we are going to split might as well do at least 1/5 if not 1/10.

we don't want to have to do a split right after a split.

+1

I say patience and split 10:1 when we actually need it. Too many here want... get rich quick.
If this company is managed professionally and seriously with level heads, it WILL grow. FACT.