Quote from: CyberKuro on January 16, 2018, 11:08:07 PM

Quote from: nickflyer on January 11, 2018, 09:08:57 PM

Quote from: carlfebz2 on January 11, 2018, 08:58:54 PM

Its not actually funny since this thing is a common problem among those people who do set out very small fees: Seeing the ff:

Fees 0.000113 BTC
Fee per byte 43.798 sat/B

If you do try to look on here https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/ you would able to see how many transactions being made on that bracket.

BTC Core is doing a fine job developing Bitcoin Legacy... they're digging their own grave. Screw this, I'm converting to BCH.

Screw Bitcoin Legacy.

I have a transaction that stuck for over a month, simply because of the low fee as well. Since the mempool get flooded with too many unconfirmed transactions, there is nothing we can do about it but pay higher fees.
Not sure if we blaming core developers for all of this problems, whether bigger blocks is the answer such as BCH.
But, we have segwit as a temporary solution for scale problem, it just most of the bitcoin users do not use it in the daily transaction, especially for exchanges which has the biggest trading volume.

Yes, we do have the option on using segwit but just for some personal usage and people still uses the traditional ways and talking about exchange implementing such changes or transitions wont really be an easy thing. I admit BCH is better since it do have bigger blocks but we cant really stop people on keep using core, seems like unconfirmed or congestion on the network of btc doesn't like to go down. haha