Quote from: actmyname on January 16, 2018, 07:42:29 AM

Not going to talk about the reference Lauda linked to your trust feedback because I'm not particularly informed on the whole jamalaezaz shenanigan.

Quote from: ShooterXD on January 16, 2018, 04:39:12 AM

Many of members who have judge power here work together!

You just need a IQ<80 and finger to click in some nicknames!

These are just empty insults. I don't see the point.

Quote from: ShooterXD on January 16, 2018, 04:39:12 AM

You give me red-trust using your power, but look at your trust! Just 1 postitive feedback have reference link, and a negative feedback has covered, WTF!

Yeah, because sometimes a reference is not required for feedback. When it covers a variety of different topics and can be found consistently, is there really a point to link any specific page/thread?

Suppose you're adding a negative feedback to a spammer's profile. Do you seriously link every single shitpost they created? No.

Quote from: ShooterXD on January 16, 2018, 04:39:12 AM

Click in the users who have give positive feedbacks and check they feedbacks! Same guys with without reference! OHHHHHH just a little deal, ok, your keyboard dont have printscreen?
Bitcointalk is a world reference when we talk about descentralization and and cryptocurrency, but shit like this guys will give reason to all shit about us coming from banks!

Similar to the above.

If you read the feedback comments they're usually abstract if there isn't a reference.

Imagine: how would you link a reference if your comment was: 'Leibniz has time and time again proved that they have the sharpest wit'?

Well, wheres the proof about me?

Maybe in my deleted post!

"Suppose you're adding a negative feedback to a spammer's profile. Do you seriously link every single shitpost they created? No."
Ok, when u feedback someone about shitpost, you cant write a feed back with reference and some links in text like they do many times?