Quote from: Demarsac on January 16, 2018, 10:35:03 AM

Quote from: optiminer on January 16, 2018, 09:22:04 AM

Quote from: Demarsac on January 16, 2018, 02:03:06 AM

Your newer versions are under investigation after final versions appeared to produce wrong solutions. There are suspicions that those solutions could be back engineered to working state with proper actions applied from 3rd parties.

We currently direct everyone to use previous best working software as mysteriously old versions have disappeared from your github. At the same time when we have discovered this suspicious activity.

So, this is an accusation that my miner would try to cheat the users? This is a rather large claim. You better have some proof for that. It's the opposite, I actually reduced the fee from 2.5% (OptiminerZero) to 1% only in OptiminerEquihash.

The older versions of optiminer are all on the new download site.
http://download.optiminer.pl/optiminer-equihash-2.0.0.tar.gz
http://download.optiminer.pl/optiminer-equihash-2.1.0.tar.gz
http://download.optiminer.pl/optiminer-equihash-2.1.1.tar.gz
http://download.optiminer.pl/optiminer-equihash-2.1.2.tar.gz

github does not support well the hosting of large files. That's why the files have moved.

Quote

As you know very well we do pay fees for it so we can use it as much as we like.

If it is a problem for you we can all stop using it reverting back to a modded ccminer until we can have a community miner software.

Needs create solutions and whenever there is a big need a big solution is always found. If we find ourselves without a good working miner we can always create our own.
There was no need until now.... Let me know if there is one?

Sorry, you are very wrong here. The existence of a fee does not mean you can use it like you want. You need to accept and adhere to the license to use it. What you say is like saying with a rental car you can do anything you want because you pay a rent.

If you feel like writing your own miner, go ahead.

Quote

Here is an example from log files

We thought a block was found but it was rejected by the daemon, share data: {"job":"d3a2","ip":"::ffff:x.x.x.x","port":2053,"worker":"t1xxxxxxxxxeL","height":236147,"difficulty":0.2,"shareDiff":"4596.03419805","blockDiff":1351.176112912,"blockDiffActual":1351.176112912,"blockHash":"0000007212f19755fb017650d29e3823cf44a2b5aca1cf90baa36f3152951c0f","error":{"unknown":"check coin daemon logs"}}

ERROR: CheckEquihashSolution(): invalid solution
ERROR: CheckBlockHeader(): Equihash solution invalid

Have you considered that the user might just have used the wrong hash algorithm param when connecting to the pool?

Impossible to accuse a fictional character. It's like accusing Donald Duck
But it is imperative to protect the community even from fictional characters

Give us your real name and identity here in the forum and then we can start the ball rolling

Thanks for the NEW links. We might use them in the next update

DM

There really is a huge need for a windows miner for lowend rigs, it would do wonderful things for the total hashrate, I personnaly have a lot of
6gb 1060 working elsewhere. Maybe not a bad idea to develop our own community miner.