Quote from: suchmoon on January 18, 2018, 03:33:19 AM

Quote from: AGM76 on January 18, 2018, 01:56:30 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on January 18, 2018, 01:50:56 AM

Quote from: AGM76 on January 17, 2018, 11:21:38 PM

Most people will have made money from it unless the bulk of their loans were in the the last few months.

Pretty much the definition of a ponzi, just replace "most" with "some".

I'm fed up of replying to all the nutcases. They were not a Ponzi. They were paying back less BCC coins in interest and capital releases than was being loaned to them. They didn't stop for financial reasons. If people just held the coins they would have profited more than from using their infamous lending program. So why say the lending was a Ponzi when it was the complete opposite? They also brought value in guaranteeing the capital amount invested so people didn't have to worry about their cryptos falling in value whilst also paying a percentage each day (less than the growth of the coin - they never guaranteed any percentage and many days it was zero percent). They seem to have been forced to close as they could have carried on with no financial issues.

I just quoted you saying that the last ones "investing" into this scam were left holding the bags. That is how ponzis work.

Your lack of self-awareness is just astounding. You should have realized by now that even the braindead lemmings who seem to dominate this forum lately don't believe your garbage anymore.

Oh yes they did! Back in BitConnect's early days it was stated as 1%. Don't make me hunt down the proof, perhaps easily found if search for "guaranteed" on this very thread. What next? Claiming that EthConnect NEVER had a team, that ruse created by actors in Camp BitConnect? Speakin' 'bout Camp BitConnect, even the crickets are sayin', "It's pretty fuckin quiet 'round here!"