Quote from: crypto.bin101 on January 21, 2018, 07:53:03 AM

Done some googling related to reported and effective hashrate reports in ethermine pool. The conclusion still clouded with network, fees and luck factor. At the end its not convincing. in my case a difference of 200mh/s againts reported hashrate over effective average hashrate is just off the chart. is this normal?

For me Ethermine reported vs 24h average can easily go up to 10% difference.
If I'm seeing around 5% - that's good, as it almost never goes below 5% diff.
Stale, network issues, luck, fees, general pools lack of transparency...
Also the huge hashrate (what is it today 20-30% of global hash? ) of ethermine is not really for the benefit of decentralization. Even though the hash jumps around very fast.
Feels like there're now enough "intensives" to set up and maintain a node:)