Quote from: infine on January 22, 2018, 03:49:49 PM

Quote from: nikolaich on January 17, 2018, 05:16:23 PM

Quote from: infine on January 14, 2018, 09:20:41 AM

Quote from: guystyles on January 10, 2018, 07:16:33 AM

Let me know if I got this info right.

Company keeps 2m tokens
ICO ends, and you collected 7.3m
Tokens @ ICO cost $7
7,300,000/7=1,042,857 tokens
Total: ~ 3m tokens

Total supply: 9.6m
9.6m - ~3m = 6m

Top holder of mntp has 6m mntp
#2 spot has 1.8m
#3 spot has 142k

I know where the extra 6m tokens went they are still sitting in the contract.

Here's what I want to know, can you tell me about the 200k Missing from the company wallet (the one closest to holding 2m), of which 55k of the 200k are currently being used to create liquidity on bancor's token market?

and whatever your answer, is that not a conflict of interest when you are compensated via the token option pool every 3 months if the price of mntp is less than the issuance price of mntp, and you're providing liquidity to a market that uses a formula that determines price based on its current holdings (liquidity)?

I don't even want to know why you defined call option at the end of your white paper....

Hi there,
I'm CTO of Goldmint.

You did a good investigation! Actually you're absolutely right that we withdrew 200k from the smart contract which holds our company's tokens. If you look at the code of this smart contract, you see we can withdraw not more 10% each month after ICO. 200k is exactly 10% of 2M. And you're absolutely right that we sent 55k of the 200k to Bancor's smart contact to bring more liquidity to the market.

There are no any secrets here. You can ask whatever you want. We're absolutely transparent.

Does this mean that you trade this amount of tokens on Bancor market yourselves or you transferred them directly to Bancor as the payment for the higher liquidity?

It means that we transferred MNTP tokens to Bancor market. It wasn't the payment to Bancor company.

According to coinmarketcap the price is $1.91.