Quote from: yslyung on January 23, 2018, 01:17:36 AM

hey OP thx for your hardwork, i'm testing hasher & liking it so far, let me play around with it, i will gladly donate.

a little more info on the interface will be nice, bigger fonts too, maybe allow resizing ?

have no idea what it is doing during benchmarking but it's ok for me

i'd like the option of adding api-bind option so i can monitor the miners

how about miner name ? btcadd followed by "." ?

liking it so far, will test it out n see how it goes.

any chance to use my own preferred/custom miners ?

will report back & looking fwd for further improvements.

Thanks a lot for your kind words! Let me answer each of your comments. :-)
Interface: sure, Im always listening for suggestions regarding the design. These changes are quite minor and i will happily integrate them. Before that, i prefer having something perfectly functioning (although i might add some suggestions out of entertainment if i get bored debugging) :-)
Benchmarking: the readme says what it does for those who care: it only runs each enabled miner/algo on selected pools supporting the algo for some time. The longest the more accurate. What I like to do is run a quick bench on everything and when I have an idea of the best performing algos, I rerun a long benchmark only on them.
api-bind: looks like there is a need for additional parameters (it could be something else than api-bind). So I will add a feature in advanced setting to allow for custom extra parameters. Thanks!
Miner name: you mean the identifier on the pools? Yes i can definitely add something so that users can change it (but I think the currency should always stay, so that new users who dont know how it works dont end up not being paid...). That way, you will be able to change it to whatever you want!
Custom miner: fantastic idea! I never thought of it. This would require quite some work, but its definitely something Id be happy to integrate.

Im impressed you took time to comment and provide feedback, thank you so much. My hardware is still limited and I have no idea how it performs on more than 2 GPUs, etc. So Im truly grateful you took some time trying it out, and especially suggest new features. Im so happy to be able to improve it thanks to you!

Quote from: Zikkson on January 23, 2018, 04:52:02 AM

Great features! Thanks about intensity, didnt know its different. Never had problem with default Nemosminer intensity on my gtx1060 rigs, so i will set it same.
Dont know if you still looks on Nemosminer release notes, but last version added Palgins HSR miner for neoscrypt and its great 10% hash boost. So maybe sometime in future could be good addition in Hasher too Wink

In fact, I try but its hard to easily or quickly find information about new miners or best performing ones. Im really happy if users can report on miners to request their addition because they perform much better, like you did, because I dont have the time to effectively curate them all myself. In other words, if i was alone doing it I would check once a month and update. But if I receive reports like this, its much easier and faster for me. So, sure, I will gladly add it quickly. Thank you so much for your help!

Really, Im elated to see this enthusiasm, it helps me a lot - thanks guys! Looks like the list of new feature requests grows, so instead of posting a quick patch, next time I will make a significant release. Hopefully, by this weekend. :-)