Quote from: AlexGR on January 24, 2018, 12:21:53 AM

Quote from: johnsmithx on January 21, 2018, 06:42:22 PM

Quote from: Zionatin on January 21, 2018, 05:52:45 PM

This is all nonesense. Only bitcoincash bitcoingold and maybe one or two others gave you anything. The rest are filthy lies and tricks to get people to make mistakes when they claim their so called "free" coin. Most of these coins have no wallet so there is nowhere to import your privatekey.

In fact what you are saying is nonsense. Most of the forks that already happened do have wallets, do have the source code, are fully working and functional. Some of them are already being traded on various exchanges and have deposits and withdrawals enabled. You should first educate yourself on the subject before you ridicule yourself by saying such an uneducated nonsense.

Some maybe, not "most".

Absolutely not "some maybe", you just proved beyond any doubt whatsoever that if you are not a total retard then you are intentionally and willfully lying. And of course it's pointless to ever respond or react in any way, shape or form to retards or scammers. But I will bother a bit anyway, just to ridicule you even further because you don't deserve anything better given your filthy attitude.

If you or that other imbecile knew anything about Bitcoin software, anything at all, you would have known that it's one single software that contains everything in it - the network logic, the consensus rules, the node daemon, the wallet, a command line client for rpc and most of all that is then duplicated into one monolithic gui binary. So it's virtually impossible to clone the original Bitcoin software, have the cloned network functional and running and not have a wallet. It's one and the same software.

Furthermore, if you or that other imbecile knew anything about the license used, anything at all, you would have known that it would be a violation of the license to publish the binaries without the source code. Now I won't even venture into contemplating whether you or that other imbecile could possibly have any legal awareness because of course you don't, but if you did then you would know that a license violation is a copyright infringement and that is a criminal offense in most jurisdictions anywhere in the world.

So not only most of the forks that already happened and are functional and running (I say "most" only as a precaution, I am not aware of one single exception) do have wallets (they cannot not have wallets!), but they also do have the source code published so even if they also published the binaries (which I wouldn't recommend to blindly download and use, we all know what happened to BTG) anybody can compile the source code and produce their own binaries, which naturally include the wallet because the wallet feature is inseparable from the rest of the software.

Quote from: AlexGR on January 24, 2018, 12:21:53 AM

And what he's saying is right, in that it's the same website template, with all the same stuff, slightly tweaked...

If you or that other imbecile knew anything about Bitcoin forks, anything at all, you would know that what such a fork really comes down to is a copy&paste of the original source code with a few more or less minor changes. That's it. So how can a software that's more than 99% the same as the original and any other fork, a software that has vast majority of all the features identical, not have a very similar website "with all the same stuff"? Only a total retard couldn't possibly understand that.

Quote from: AlexGR on January 24, 2018, 12:21:53 AM

And they are made by chinese.

To that I can only voice an obvious observation, that is you are just a pathetic racist piece of shit. And welcome to my ignore list.