Quote from: EcuaMobi on January 24, 2018, 07:19:51 PM

Quote from: Husires on January 24, 2018, 07:14:11 PM

Being on that list is a ticket to hide any member's signature

Exactly! And therefore that would stop incentivizing spammers to spam

Quote from: Husires on January 24, 2018, 07:14:11 PM

"No one can know you or Grievance against your decision"

To be discussed. The system could show who marked the user as spammer. And there could be an option for others to unmark him if they disagree or if the post quality improved.

Then there could be a formula to decide whether or not to remove the signature rights, just like users can have an overall positive trust if someone trusted left them negative feedback and several others left positive trust later.

Quote from: SFR10 on January 24, 2018, 07:14:29 PM

At least 6 DT2 members or 3 DT1 members are needed, in order for a user to lose the ability to wear a signature (this way it will be less prone to abuse)

6 and 3 sound too much to me to be honest. But there should be a method to prevent non-spammers to be affected because a single DT user didn't like his post, either by initially requiring more than one tag or by allowing others to untag, as stated above.

So a "spammer" tag would be introduced and that spammer tag would then remove a signature if X amount of spammer tags have been added by DT members? I need to think this through but it sounds interesting.

One note: the number of 'spammer' tags should maybe be calculated on a percentage to accommodate the DT list growing or reducing.

Would there then need to be a way to counter spammer tags if others think it is an inappropriate rating?