Quote from: minifrij on January 24, 2018, 08:53:19 PM

Quote from: EcuaMobi on January 24, 2018, 06:34:33 PM

Another idea which could work, something like merging the SMAS list into the trust system:

On every profile, besides Trust, there's an option to mark user as spammer
This instantly makes that user's signature invisible for the user who marked him, or add him into the ignore list, to be decided
If the user who marked him is on DT1 or DT2; staff; or any other list to be decided, then the marked user losses the right to wear a signature. This way, it's not up to signature managers to allow them into a campaign or not. The forum would disable the signature for him

I'm a big fan of this, especially regarding the third part of the suggestion. I think that part is near crucial though. Without this, we will just reach a similar issue that we are having currently where people are getting all riled up and not much is actually changing.

Absolutely, I'm not giving 3 suggestions but 1. I consider the 3rd part extremely important too.

Quote from: Husires on January 24, 2018, 08:57:30 PM

How can we prevent system misuse?(keep hiding some signature).

By:

Managing the list. People can be removed from the list if they wrongfully tag people as spammers
By requiring more than one person to tag a person to remove signature privileges. I'd say 2 tags are enough
By allowing others to untag users, then the sum (tags - untags) would have to be 2 or more