Quote from: VolanicEruptor on August 07, 2013, 10:30:48 PM

Quote from: crumbs on August 07, 2013, 10:10:51 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on August 07, 2013, 10:05:21 PM

Quote from: crumbs on August 07, 2013, 09:17:38 PM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on August 07, 2013, 08:56:03 PM

Quote from: knybe on August 07, 2013, 08:50:06 PM

Just curious: is it, or is it not a big deal that Seagate has invested in eASIC?

in an industry where speed and size is crucial for design, It's definitely nice to see that they want to rely on eASIC

I love the logicians in this thread<3

1. Our guy's dealing with eASIC.
2. Seagate deals with eASIC.
3. ? ? ?
4. Therefore, we're as solid as Seagate.

Roll Eyes

Your interpretation of my logic is the flaw, kid. I am appreciating the solidity of eASIC, not the solidity of AM.

Thanks for clearing that up, mister. This bein' an AM thread, it's easy for a yungin' like myself to get all confuseded.

Discussing the success of eASIC is important in determining the future of Activemining, seeing as how they work together. Is your head okay??

Was anyone ever worried about eASIC being full of fail? I sort'a assumed that eASIC was 4realz, i guess there's room for concern there too. As Porky Pig so eloquently put it, "wwworry, ww-worry, ww-w-worry."
My head's fine, btw, nice of you to ask.