Quote from: johhnyUA on January 26, 2018, 12:53:41 PM

Лауда троллит Grin

Quote from: Lauda on January 26, 2018, 12:47:24 PM

Quote from: akram143 on January 26, 2018, 09:01:57 AM

Hi OP,I have some big cats for you,surely they abused the merit system so they also deserves negative trust.Highly untrustworthiness from them.The source is below

Quote from: playboy654 on January 26, 2018, 05:03:13 AM

First of all I am not against the merit,I just want to figure out the negativities.
If someone said DT will be fair while distributing the merits.I will say no,
Here I have a reference for that,Lauda and aTriz most well know members of our forum exchanging merits between them.
1.Lauda merited aTriz for running a twitter campaign ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2482937.msg25417254#msg25417254 )
2.aTriz merited Lauda for a shit answer ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2813828.msg28801076#msg28801076 )
If you are saying that posts deserves 50 and 20 merits.I am totally against you.So all the merits are going to stuck between the well known forum member.

Absolute bullshit. The amount of merit that each of us deserves is within thousands, and you complain about double digit numbers. Roll Eyes

If anyone deserves negative trust, it is you for your defamatory nonsense.

Quote from: killyou72 on January 26, 2018, 12:22:16 PM

The merit for lauda I see it has it doesn't matter because they are all ready legendary and aTriz made a great post that is formatted nicly

I could merit him or anyone comparable on random posts and it wouldn't be close to *abuse*. E.g., this is a perfectly valid post to merit:

Quote from: TMAN on January 26, 2018, 12:44:53 PM

No. bye.

лауда тот еще кадр, мне второй акк она ни за что тоже покрасила. вот есть же люди-говно