Quote from: NameTaken on January 27, 2018, 09:10:29 AM

Quote from: Supercoiner111 on January 27, 2018, 08:58:38 AM

Any improvement, been a while since a good upgrade?

No need to hurry when making 300k a month.

very true lol ... Ppl are paying for "no support". With this kind of money he should be working on that program 24/7 Angry

Quote from: NoOneLt on January 27, 2018, 04:20:00 PM

I actually advocated EWBF earlyer, but sticking with DSTM now

Test ended with average 3049 EWBF vs 3099 DSTM. 50 free hashes? Sounds good for me... --fee 0 didn't helped EWBF. And at least in my case i still see 2% less shares then reported by miner. And even some say they see 1% reduce it still does not save EFBW.

And this is GDDR5X cards witch presumably should have worked better on EFBW.

P.S. I am not related to DSTM or EFBW in any way, long time used both but recent discussion in DSTM thread pushed me to do a test myself. Believe me or not, this was exactly same machiene of 6x1080 (non ti) not tweaked in any way for one or another miner, and it was not even restarted during test period.

So for us miners it is actually bad, DSTM does not have competition and would get out even with 3% fee....

lul thats stupid man.
ewbf = 3049
dstm = 3099 - 2% = 3037

Why use DSTM if earning less ? Makes no sense. And yes, --fee 0 works in EWBF.

Quote from: NoOneLt on January 27, 2018, 04:41:17 PM

Quote from: newmz on January 27, 2018, 04:34:29 PM

Why do you say "GDDR5X cards witch presumably should have worked better on EWBF"? Based on what?

DSTM stated that he will look into GDDR5X optimisation, and someone advocated EFBW to be better on GDDR5X cards here.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2021765.msg28416751#msg28416751

yes EWBF works better with GDD5X(1080, 1080Ti).