Quote from: Thule on October 31, 2018, 07:30:44 AM

Yes i will contact today the DT1 members who elected VOD and will hold them responsible for his actions and permanent lies.

Maybe i will even go a step further on him with legal charges for calling me in public a scammer and a criminal.

You are free to do both of those things, but I suspect you won't do either and predict that if you do, it's just going to feed your impotent rage. Vod's not getting removed from DT over your problem, and law enforcement would probably try to stifle their laughter.

Quote from: actmyname on October 31, 2018, 11:26:28 AM

Here's the case in point: you put down "100 BTC" as the risked amount in the feedback.
Why? There was no BTC involved in any trade or lack thereof.

This is what I've been trying to explain to him. The amount he put in that feedback is the basis for Vod's claim that Thule is lying in his feedback about me by claiming I scammed him for 100 bitcoins. Thule either doesn't understand it or is willfully ignoring it. It bothers me not a bit either way, given that I have many negs from people who have made some very specific claims of me scamming them for very specific amounts--and none of them include any valid (leading to evidence of me scamming) references, and most don't include reference links at all.

I've made mistakes in tagging members before, and when I realize my mistake I try to make good. But there's a world of difference between a mistake made with the intention of trying to warn others against a shady member or outright scammer, and revenge feedback. The latter is what Thule is engaging in, as are most people who've left me (and Vod, Lauda, actmyname, marlboroza, and others) negs.

Back in January, you wrote this post:

Quote from: Thule on January 28, 2018, 02:29:48 AM

just have a look guys.Selling accounts is according to guidelines allowed
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0

At that time account sellers/buyers were routinely getting tagged by DT members even though it isn't explicitly against forum rules--and the practice of doing such had been discussed since probably 2016. The forum has rules, but the community has standards. Bitcointalk doesn't moderate scams, for instance, but you can be damn sure scammers are going to get tagged. Thus your argument above holds no water.

I don't think all account buyers/sellers are scammers, but it's a behavior that I don't trust and I believe in my usual feedback statement "Account [buyers/sellers] are not to be trusted" when I leave it on people's trust page. Now that I've been called out for fucking up royally in the case of iluvbitcoins, I'm going to be weighing individual circumstances a lot more heavily before handing out negs to account dealers. Having said that, my feedback on Thule is on the money.

I've also been known to remove negs from members when they've demonstrated improvement, but based Thule's shitty attitude, empty threats, and unjustified retaliatory feedbacks, that's not likely to ever happen.