Quote from: minifrij on January 28, 2018, 04:08:39 PM

Quote from: endlasuresh on January 28, 2018, 03:07:14 PM

So the merit system is for totally free or should use as one wishes?

The Merit system is intended to be used if you find a post, or the person posting it, constructive and beneficial to the forum. I do agree that this is very general, however whether it is abuse or not does - I think - depend on the people involved.

Quote from: endlasuresh on January 28, 2018, 03:07:14 PM

Here I see someone offering signature campaign on merit base system.

Providing that the merit system is used as intended, and how the signature campaign was run, that could be a completely legitimate way to use Merit.

For example, if a user is running a signature campaign and would only accept users over a certain threshold of merit then it would be absolutely fine. Since given merit is intended to be used as a way to gauge post quality, only accepting users with a high amount of merit would be a fairly decent way to weed out shitposters.
However, if a user was running a signature campaign and required each participant to give him merit to get paid then it would be wrong and the user would likely be warned/punished for such.

Quote from: Thule on January 28, 2018, 04:07:28 PM

I gave them a choice and once the 24h is over i'm going to make it massivly public how Lauda is abusing and scamming people.

This should be fun.

Hey scammer giving merit for the word butthead is constructive for the forum ?
You fuckers come here claiming to save the forum claiming there was a consent to many topics like not selling accounts and abusing your trust power where even mods didn't agreed on that else they would change the terms and guideliness and after you were exposed you claim it was a community consensus ?
I guess community means just you few fuckers to make self benefical.

Best of all most you fuckers were back in the days lending coins for accounts as collateral.
Seems you had no issues with that fucking losers