Quote from: N_S on August 12, 2013, 02:02:10 AM

Quote from: crumbs on August 12, 2013, 01:51:57 AM

You'll have to be clearer as to why you're hesitant to accept the word i haven't offered.
Are you disputing the date in question? I can assure you it is correct. If you are doubting that 1994 was, indeed, at the tail end of the last century, i can confirm that also. American colloquialism for such a time-span is "more than a coon's age." That's long.

The word you've offered is that ">>it be different nao<<". You've made a statement that what was contained in the links provided by Vbs is in some way out-of-date or irrelevant.

Please explain why someone should believe your statement as you've provided no evidence to substantiate it.

I'm not saying you're wrong, btw.

You may have read in more meaning than was intended -- i wished to shed some light that the case sited happened a long time ago.
If one has to reach back into the last millennium for an example of US not getting its way, perhaps that in itself should be indicative of your folly?