Quote from: matjas on January 29, 2018, 10:45:19 AM

Quote from: helloal on January 29, 2018, 10:35:46 AM

Quote from: niklasmato on January 29, 2018, 10:27:55 AM

Quote from: omwibya on January 29, 2018, 09:01:18 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 29, 2018, 08:02:28 AM

Quote from: the_lovely on January 29, 2018, 07:26:59 AM

Quote from: alphashotgun on January 29, 2018, 07:23:46 AM

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

probably because it's a serious long term project for real investors willing to take a risk for big reward. now I agree that I would like the minimum lower , but one of the disadvantage of having more investors, is market fluctuation of the token price.

After reading bits and pieces of the whitepaper I'm pretty sure this can turn out to be a huge project, but it will take time.. There are so many technologies involved and so many things that need to be done. A big ICO is needed, but for the people who can invest and wait this can turn out to be a project with a huge ROI.

I think this project will be more attractive as a community/societal enhancing contribution, rather than having a huge ROI. This project have big goals, and will be doing things slowly step by step.

It can be both: development of a healthcare system and good ROI, I think it mostly depends on the team performance, they have all the tools, they seem to have experience, we'll see how they will use it.

Agree there are the chances for a successful project here. It just need to be get it done.