Quote from: TMAN on January 25, 2018, 06:07:20 PM

Quote from: ibminer on January 25, 2018, 05:59:54 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on January 25, 2018, 05:49:36 PM

If posts have not received enough merit for how good they are, wouldn't they have to be from "back in history" for that statement to make sense? Also, there is a great deal of merit to satoshi's posts whether his account is active or not.

Well sure, any post that is made right now is now in "history" a second after the post, I'm saying going back years in time to merit posts that have inactive accounts. I thought part of the idea here is sort of a trickle-down effect, when you are sending those sMerits to satoshi, he is getting 1/2 of those merits as sMerits, and will never send them to anyone and those sMerits are lost. I guess a "merit source" may not care as much because they can create the merit... my thoughts were to look at current/ongoing posts and selecting ones right now that may be worth merit.

If we go back into *all* history, my sMerits will be spent quickly and will probably be going to users that aren't as active anymore.

you get a merit...

OG once again proving to be a totally uneducated moron...

cant even read basic instructions.. and that obviously means you are NOT a merit source right now... oh my that must sting.. treasurer, DT... but not a new merit source??

poor og...

I hear some cheap sausages calling your name..

EDIT: using DT1 power to bully people who don't agree with you is the antithesis of what a merit source is all about... as usual a lazy and self aggrandizing post from OG

EDIT 2 : OG's thirst for power on the forum is unquenchable. Obviously theymos recognizes this and purposefully left him out. This post only proves it

Why are you such a jackass?