Quote from: Deena on January 30, 2018, 10:15:04 AM

In what sense are you comparing aTriz and Lauda to a dead horse?

And that the amount of threads created in this board against aTriz and Lauda is very high only is a sign of their abuse of power. It is the latter which is 'ridiculous' not that people react to it.

Those two don't necessarily follow. When you're adding to someone's criminal record (real-life equivalent of red trust for the sake of the comparison) then of course there will be backlash whether you're right or not. Just because someone is vocal about it does not mean that they are innocent. You may very well have ponzi promotors/owners creating scores of threads but would that mean there's an abuse of power?

Quote from: Deena on January 30, 2018, 10:15:04 AM

My sad conclusion has to be that the forum owner himself has to be corrupt too, for otherwise he would not maintain the situation as it is.

It doesn't make sense to allow someone who canand probably has and willmake people leave the forum because of the negative trust that they place upon them. If theymos wanted to generate more money he could simply let the rubbish continue while he rakes in the ad revenue.

Quote from: Deena on January 30, 2018, 10:15:04 AM

That's the evil thing about the forum governance. Laws and punishment are detached from each other. It's like the cop who's given the fiat to shoot whoever he likes, innocent or not.

I don't think you understand my point. The irony in Thule's arguments is that they continue to contradict one another.

If he states that he did nothing wrong because it was not located in the rules then he should not be pursuing his arguments about any perceived scamming on Lauda's part, since scams are also against the rules.

Quote from: Deena on January 30, 2018, 10:15:04 AM

So shall we all stop doing it then? 'I can be bad but you cannot' is not a good argument either.

Doing what? Sending merit?