Yes they have a right to merit their posters but no offense here it's not the manager's responsibility to give merits to their quality posters it's not their problem that some posters don't get merits and also, if a poster applied to join in that campaign right?
It might not be the CMs
responsibility, then who has then? It is not their
problem, true, its not really have to be a problem, in this case its just going to be an
incentive to the participants for them to even strive more to have quality posts.
so, he/she already accepted the rules and regulations of the manager. They must follow it in order to get paid. If the posters want to get merited then post constructive and helpful posts. This forum isn't made for earning money okay? Iust be happy that you are paid to post here in bitcointalk.
Well, obviously because they've
already joined a Signature Campaign. Exactly, that's why I'm suggesting this, in order for the participants to have a chance in gaining merits, because as of now, the topics that people are meriting is only on selected topics.
I think this will add burden for campaign managers having 100 participants then will review 25 post each just for is to gain some sort of merits though they really try their best looking at the quality of our post but this one will require them to read deeper. How about those managers having 2 to 3 campaigns running? I also want some merits but there are really managers who give merits so O don't think this is necessary
Burden? Really? Are you serious right now - that is their job for God's sake, its their duty to monitor and review the posts of all the participants. Are you saying that
not all CMs are doing their jobs and just looking at the
start post count and the
end post count - not the
exact post of the participants? Man that's some serious issue right there.