Quote from: Thule on January 30, 2018, 05:40:16 PM

which rules ?
The one Lauda and his group created themself ?

Maybe we will enforce now also the new rule they talked about to force project managers or ITO's to accept their guidelines which will tell them which users they are allowed to accept and which not and if they disagree the group will start defaming him or the whole ITO.

Seems to me a very legit person/group and a great plan with a positiv benefit for the whole community

But since you are also in Ad management i can understand why you join this scam

You're not offering any logical arguments here. Anybody that tries to argue against you is automatically part of Lauda's scam team and thus their opinion is invalid. Anybody that sides with you is automatically right.

With that kind of labeling, of course you would never be at fault.

You seem to continually talk about the arbitrary rules that 'Lauda and his group' declared. Here's the thing: the trust system actually allows for thatsubjectivity in feedbacksince it is given at a user's discretion. Like for example, the feedback that you sent Slow death: "I don't like you.Am now going to use the Trust feedback the same way like Lauda and his group is doing which you support".

You're allowed to send negative feedback to someone you don't trust. That is, after all, how it's supposed to work. So if several community members don't think that account trading is trustworthy, are we not then allowed to send negative feedback?