I've had to delete multiple posts that were just spam in this review-round, please do not post local-section posts that I cannot read. They won't get merit, and they won't be left in the thread; if you want merit for these threads, let them stand on their own or go to a similar thread to this in your local section.

Quote from: AMiRU on January 31, 2018, 09:03:51 AM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2678525.msg27347917#msg27347917
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2771048.msg28318946#msg28318946
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2233834.msg27783414#msg27783414

OP should merit you for answering a Binance question, I don't see how that is something I would want to merit; not helpful to me, the community at-large or high-quality by my standards. The Twitter Re-audit has nothing to do with bitcoin, development, blockchain or anything else that we even do here. The only relevancy twitter has to this forum are the terrible bounties that pop-up using twitter as their platform of choice. It is not helpful, but you can expect merit from the people you are actually "helping". Your last post is the 879th reply to an ICO and the only thing you do is ask a question that's already been answered and said "Thanks." No merit, and I feel like you've intentionally wasted my time.

Quote from: colonel_koval on January 31, 2018, 10:00:16 AM

Since you have flooded me with your posts and were kind enough to point to which you believe to be your strongest posts are I have only reviewed the posts in bold and I am not impressed. These aren't high-quality or helpful posts, and if you do believe them to be helpful then ask for merit from those you have helped with these posts. Try to submit only a few of your very best posts for review, because you are not going to get merit for posts like this.

Quote from: Alone055 on January 31, 2018, 10:11:24 AM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2822349.msg29032142#msg29032142

I've given you merit for this post, because you are right higher character count != higher quality post. It seems like you're not just posting for the sake of posting in this thread and you honestly are sharing your thoughts, which aren't completely without nuance and insight.

Quote from: Alone055 on January 27, 2018, 12:40:45 PM

while the quality of a post has nothing to do with its quantity of length.

I do have to disagree with you on this though, while using more characters doesn't necessitate that your post is of higher-quality there still certainly is some correlation between character count and post quality (albeit subjective, at best). For example, there will never be a quality post with only a single character. Therefore, it cannot be the case that post-quality has "nothing" to do with character-count, because there is a minimum even if there is not a maximum.

Quote from: Alone055 on January 31, 2018, 10:11:24 AM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2825620.msg28967524#msg28967524
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2842261.msg29153561#msg29153561
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2851361.msg29262421#msg29262421

Unfortunately I did not find the rest of your submitted posts to be as compelling, however I would encourage you to submit more of your posts, because you definitely have it in you to have these high-quality, fun and nuanced conversations.

Quote from: bug.lady on January 31, 2018, 10:24:56 AM

Congratulations, you've submitted more posts than anyone in this thread to-date. In my opinion, none of these deserve merit from a 3rd party such as myself. A lot of these posts are either answering a specific person's question, correcting their misinformation or simply responding to a "funny story" thread. These are not universally helpful or high-quality, in my opinion. You should expect merit from the users you help, intrigue, make laugh (maybe) or something of that vein. These posts have done nothing for me of that sort, so for now you go without merit from me.

Again, only submit your best posts, you more than likely do not have a dozen posts that deserve merit, unless you are really special.