Quote from: soniclord on January 31, 2018, 10:33:27 AM

Quote from: nullius on January 31, 2018, 07:14:40 AM

Quote from: soniclord on January 31, 2018, 05:08:33 AM

Yes, I am guilty, but not so much :-(

Then after you got red-handed and your trust bled, you sent a message posthaste to someone whose profile page expressly states:

Quote from: actmyname

IF YOU HAVE RED TRUST: DO NOT MESSAGE ME IMMEDIATELY. WAIT AT LEAST 72 HOURS OR THE PM WILL BE IGNORED.

Oops! actmyname kept his promise by ignoring you:

Quote from: soniclord on January 31, 2018, 05:08:33 AM

I wrote actmyname, but he ignores me.

it took more than 3 days

LIAR. The date stamp on actmynames negative trust feedback to you is 2018-01-25, as any reader may verify on your trust page. This was as for 50 merit you sent Chetty (uid #1080650) 2018-01-25 14:00:16. You left retaliatory negative trust for actmyname on 2018-01-26. That is also on your trust page, and in the screenshot I posted earlier; have another look:

It is unfortunate that the trust datestamps lack greater precision (maybe via some API?). The lower bound on how long you waited is 9 hours, 59 minutes, 44 seconds (2018-01-25 14:00:16 to 2018-01-26 00:00). The upper bound is 35 hours, 59 minutes, 44 seconds. Either way, you waited nowhere close to 72 hours, and certainly not more than 3 days, before leaving gross retaliatory feedback you had no right to leave anyway.

Quote from: soniclord on January 31, 2018, 10:33:27 AM

Quote from: nullius on January 31, 2018, 07:14:40 AM

You even helpfully lied, and claimed that you risked 1.0 BTC in a matter whereby actmyname violated your trust (n.b. that actmyname properly claimed he risked 0.0 BTC as to you). [...]

I have the right to evaluate my work myself. having lowered to me trust the person has deprived me of work and which I was engaged in earnings for 3 years.

I have the right to evaluate my feelings myself. Having offended me, you injured me by making me feel disgusted. I evaluate that at 1000000 BTC cost. I will now leave you negative trust based on that number. Deal?

(Somebody does not understand the concept of an objective measure.)

I will not waste my time with the rest of your drivel in this or other posts to present. You lie, and you get caught, and you keep lying.

Quote from: Lauda on January 31, 2018, 10:55:50 AM

Quote from: soniclord on January 31, 2018, 10:54:41 AM

I have repeatedly helped users of this forum with their developments for free.
You have no right to say so!

Of course I do, classic self-entitled shitposter.

+1. If I had it to spare, that ought properly be +50.