Quote from: dollux on January 31, 2018, 11:08:23 PM

Quote from: mksmmi on January 31, 2018, 10:41:57 PM

Quote from: dollux on January 31, 2018, 06:59:41 PM

I have posted this here because I think it is highly important that you people know what you are dealing with.

Quote from: dollux on January 31, 2018, 06:53:06 PM

Quote from: JamesLit81 on January 31, 2018, 01:05:45 PM

The implication from my statement above was that it would be the Sprouts+ community at large, who'd vote on what we would do with the Sprouts coins, assuming they're ever worth anything...

Rest assured though, if the majority of the 5,000+ Sprouts+ community members across Discord, Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, Youtube and the forum, voted to dump the Sprouts coins onto the market in an attempt to destroy Sprouts, the dev team would not honour the vote as that mentality doesn't fit in with the Sprouts+ philosophy of helping others and doing good.

Yup the above says it all, JamesLit81 and the so called Sprouts+ dev team have

NO INTEGRITY

https://preview.ibb.co/frbb86/Lord_Action_6.png

What would be the point of having a vote if it would not be honoured, you sould have never let that one out of the bag,
you are banged to rights by your own statement and not to be trusted because you have no honour, integrity or worth,
quite sad really because it turns out that you are the one with the mentality of a child.

Bro see the sprouts website.... that was also developed by child lol..... he might work in the development of sprouts... rather than creating a new thing that project was opensource as I know. We know some worse case than sprouts. Those crypto only survived because of community, promotion, donation etc. Imagine the issue with doge... if they took the same decisions there might be we have dog+, dog++, dog++++++++++++ Huh

Sorry buster, but none of what you have said addresses the issue.

The issue is a lack of integrity, not web sites or even sprouts, it is the lack of integrity of the sprouts+ leader and team by admission of their so called leader.

Your post is exactly the kind of lack of real discussion I am talking about, you divert the subject matter somewhere else to deflect the failings of the project leaders/dev's.

So this posting of yours exasperates the lack of integrity.

Ah, Dollux,

Welcome back. Was wondering when you'd chime in again.

Spectacularly, yet again, you've highlighted your inability to understand... well, anything.

Integrity is specifically what was on display in the post you've singled out as being proof we lack integrity!

Let me spell it out for you

Sprouts+ has a philosophy that is philanthropic in nature. Our goal is to help people and do good things for people (and animals.)

Everything we do as an organisation, brand, community, first and foremost, must adhere to these principals.

Let's call it, part of the Sprouts+ constitution.

If someone opts (or votes) to do something that goes against the Sprouts+ constitution, then the team will review, and likely not honour that request.

You say we lack integrity because we would not carry out a request that goes against the Sprouts+ constitution, that was hurtful or harmful to the intended recipient. We call that integrity and loyalty to the Sprouts+ constitution and everything Sprouts+ stands for and is about.

But well done for once again pointing out your ineptitude.